Brian Euclide
My feedback
5 results found
-
34 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Brian Euclide supported this idea ·An error occurred while saving the comment Brian Euclide commentedI can't believe that there are not more people pushing for this issue! In my opinion, this is a critical gap in the product. The absence of the ability to spread the subscription out over the life of the subscription to revenue from deferred revenue is a major problem. We can associate the subscription to deferred revenue, but we are left to make the manual entry in books for each month.
-
1 voteBrian Euclide shared this idea ·
-
1 voteBrian Euclide shared this idea ·
-
53 votesBrian Euclide supported this idea ·
-
433 votesBrian Euclide supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Brian Euclide commentedI agree. Many subscription models want to allow the user to renew and pay prior to the actual renewal date so that there is no gap in service.
This is critical to the complete concept of a subscription. The use of deferred revenue and then realizing the actual revenue over the life of the subscription is ESSENTIAL! I would be happy with a simple report that identified to me by product per month to be realized. Without this simple element, this product is USELESS.