Skip to content

Robin W

My feedback

8 results found

  1. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Robin W commented  · 

    I have discovered a very simple way for Zoho to take a step in the right direction here. It is not available yet as a mobile App but Zoho already has a great image annotation app for PC called Zoho Annotator. It can be added as a Google Chrome extension and provides great image annotation capabilities. Once added as a Chrome extension, when viewing or editing Zoho expenses it is possible to right-click any receipt attached to an expense and immediately launch Zoho Annotator to edit it. The only thing missing is that once you have finished editing, it is necessary to save the annotated image and re-attach it to the associated expense as a new receipt.
    All Zoho needs to do is directly link Zoho Expense to the Zoho Annotator tool to integrate the editing of receipts (right-click any receipt and annotate as before), but on completion, allow the annotated receipt to be saved back to the expense directly without the need to reattach it.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Robin W commented  · 

    I would particularly like to see a basic image editing tool to allow receipt annotation. Sometimes the expense to be claimed is mixed up within a longer receipt. Users currently have to manually write on the receipt prior to scanning and uploading which spoils the receipt. Post upload annotation would be a big improvement.

    Robin W supported this idea  · 
  2. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Robin W supported this idea  · 
  3. 17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Robin W supported this idea  · 
  4. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Robin W commented  · 

    I think this capability already exists by clicking on "itemize" and then adding separate line items for each of the categories that you wish to separately identify, unless I have misunderstood the request?

  5. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Robin W supported this idea  · 
  6. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Robin W supported this idea  · 
  7. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Robin W commented  · 

    I totally agree. In order to reconcile expense receipts with data pulled from credit cards, the full amount on the receipt has to be recorded as the expense even if only a portion of it represents the expense to be claimed. I currently use a workaround whereby I itemise the expense, the first item represents the full receipt amount and the second item uses a category "Personal Expense" and has a negative value corresponding the amount I do not wish to claim. The total then represents the amount to be claimed. However, negative values are only supported by the browser version and not by the App. It would be much more logical to simply itemise the expense into reimbursable and non-reimbursable portions.

    Robin W supported this idea  · 
  8. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Robin W commented  · 

    Totally agree. Checking expense claims both for the originator prior to submission and for the reviewer post submission is a lot more efficient if the expenses are presented in the order in which they were incurred. Manual reordering is supported for itemised expense entries so why not also for expenses within a report?

    Robin W supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base